"Can the church
become more people friendly?"

Ignatius Desmond
Sullivan (Oxford, England)
Please feel free
to contact me with your thoughts -
i_d_sullivan@hotmail.com
|
Digesting Vatican II
Happy signs of the future and sadness of the wicked world sit side
by side within the text of the documents of Vatican II. For example,
the words which introduce the Decree of the Church begin in language
of ordinary people: Christ the light of the world to all nations.
The Decree Gaudium Et Spes speaks of the excellence of human
liberty, and the dignity of the human person: language far from the
solid deadliness of the theology manuals of the seminaries. The
ancient truth are often expressed in new languages without changing
the content of revelation.
Theologically speaking Decrees of a Council carry more weight then
regulations from Curia officials: and even Papal encyclicals, in
themselves are below such Decrees. In the wider perspective,
therefore, Council Decrees are a "gold standard" against which
subsequent Vatican utterances should be measured and assessed. For
example, Humanae Vitae needs to be understood in the light of
Vatican II and to be so assessed.
Lumen Gentium speaks of the "mystery of the Church", it has a unique
relationship with Christ as a kind of sacrament or sign of union
with God, and of the unity of mankind.
Its origins are in the wisdom and goodness of God the Father,
through the redemption of the Son, under the guidance of the Holy
Spirit. This Holy Church of Christ is described in biblical terms -
a description fully acceptable to every Christian body in the world
and held in admiration by many others.
A very significant event during the Council illustrates the
reasoning behind the above statements. One of the Cardinals (dressed
in the black robes of a monk - instead of the scarlet robes of a
Cardinal), he spoke in French (the language of the Council was
Latin) he said: I am a Catholic - but not a Roman Catholic: I
recognise the Bishop of Rome as the Pope of all Catholics. But I am
a Greek Catholic - the Patriarch of the Greek Catholic Church of
Antioch.
It was an awareness of the various churches established from
apostolic times that the Council proclaimed the diversity in unity
as the true meaning of catholicity. It also recognised that these
groups, organically united preserve the unique divine constitution
of the universal church and enjoy their own discipline, liturgical
usage, theological elaboration and spiritual heritage.
Two other insights show similar ways to the future.
On Missions.
The Council calls on the new churches to share the cultural and
social life and so be inculturalised, for it is from such an
incarnation of the message of Jesus that new insights and
theological and spiritual elaborations can arise to benefit the
whole church and humanity.
On the laity.
The Council with an eye on 1870 explained the prophetic office of
the laity in these words: "The body of the faithful, as a whole,
anointed as they are by the Holy One, cannot err in matters of
belief.
After nearly forty years, trying to implement the teaching of
Vatican II in parishes in Africa, and teaching pastoral theology in
Oxford, the findings of Vatican II seem to have given the church
unique tools with which to implement the renewal of the church as
envisioned by Pope John. It is as if new ways of looking at the
church have suddenly come into view. We have been given a new
insight into the beauty and critical eyes the imperfections of the
present structures and the past failures of the current Church and
of how far short the present church is from the shining face of
Christ. We can see how the history of the church calls into question
some of its current rules, traditions and practises. Scripture and
especially the gospels stand over against the church and reveal, the
challenge of our age in Europe and needs of the Church today.
Giant hostility opposes these new "green shots" growing in the
church and are to be seem peeping through the Decrees of the
Council. Three roots of this hostility are discernable: the creeping
infallibility common in the Roman School of theology, an
intellectual arrogance that Scholastic philosophy and theology are
the only basis for fidelity to tradition and a cultural superiority
complex that sees European sophistication as spiritually superior to
all non-European cultures, even of the new culture growing in the
society of modern Europe.
Much of the current ceremonial is meaningless to non-Europeans and
equally to the new generations taking over the culture of the world.
Teaching enshrined in words and language of scholastic philosophical
terminology seems meaningless in a scientific age. Canon Law, which
made fun of the Pharisees with 602 laws about the Sabbath, carries
no conviction when we make over 2000 laws to protect Jesus? The
church must cast aside its ideals and ideology and its preoccupation
with organisations, buildings, structures and control and come round
to helping ordinary people to grow into maturity as Christ centred
believers.
|